jump to navigation

The Creepy, Kooky, Mysterious and Spooky World of ECM April 4, 2009

Posted by Unified ECM in Document Management Software, Filing Systems, Records Management, Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , ,
add a comment

My grandfather made his living after the Great War writing catchy jingles for shows like The Addams Family and Green Acres.   He was an absolute perfectionist in his craft and thankfully a micromanager when it came to his music.  I’ve been told that not only did he write the score for The Addams Family, but he actually directed the opening credits, wrote the now classic lyrics and insisted on singing them himself.  He’s revered for leading a fight for residual rights for musicians and I’ve always admired him for that. 

           

However, when the nineteen-sixties rolled around and Elvis and the Beatles began redefining pop-music, my grandfather was reluctant to welcome the change and over time became disillusioned, bitter and jealous of the new musical trends.  He was such a great talent, certainly still is, but he resisted innovation and fell out of the limelight.

 

Lacking musical genius, what was a simple Records Management consultant like I to take from this troubadour’s history and legacy into the world of records, document, and content management?  Quite simply it’s the lesson he had failed to pick up when confronted with the new wave of rock music, the benefits of accepting and embracing change and innovation. 

 

Of course, my background was quite different from Mr. Vic Mizzy’s.  After all, I worked in bookstores, libraries and as a law firm records manager for the majority of my adult life.  I’d never been a leader in my craft like him. One thing we had in common, undeniably, was a commitment to our industry.  Yet as I came to understand the details of his biography, I recognized the underlying power of his discipline but also the mistake he made by not respecting emerging trends. 

 

addamsfamily

 

It was around this time that I was consulting with a top film finance entity in Hollywood.  The outfit, run by a sharp young man in his early thirties, was redefining the way that investment deals were structured in the Entertainment Industry.  The CEO was an educated man, respectful of the risks taken by those of his predecessors and emboldened by the financial savvy he had picked up on Wall Street just a few years before.  He was an innovator, and unlike my grandfather was open and enlightened by new ideas and approaches to the business he was married to.

 

At the time, this client was interested in finding an affordable document management solution.  Despite his corporation’s unparalleled success in the field, his company was horrified at the prospect of paying an arm and a leg to manage their records and workflow needs.  I presented them with a number of solutions ranging from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands, and one after the other, they rejected my proposals.  They were shrewd and knew what they wanted, and even though nothing was out of their price range, they demanded a good deal, which happens to be one of the secrets of their success.

 

Finally I gave up and in a half-hearted and off-hand manner proposed building them a system to their specifications.  To my surprise they agreed and told me to design for them exactly what they needed and build them the perfect document management beast.

 

The very next day I found myself sitting behind my Touchsmart wondering how to approach building this company a sophisticated document management application.  Nevertheless, I couldn’t disappoint them and gratefully accepted the challenge.  At the time they were one of only a few clients I had and I felt like a Venetian painter, indebted to my patron and pleased with my pittance.  Suddenly, here they were offering me what I viewed as the opportunity of a lifetime, the chance to design my own information management application.

 

Initially, I contacted a plethora of programmers from New York to the Silicon Valley eager to assist me with my project.  I wanted to get this developed in the United States because after all, it had given me this opportunity.  The devotion was short-lived though as I collected bids that were not only far out of my price range but little more than a sales pitch.

 

I began searching for an offshore company to handle the development.  I had a vision of what I wanted; a simplified document management solution that worked in unison with a records management system, but it needed a professional and intelligent architecture behind it.  Luckily, I had made many good friends in the information management community, from ARMA to AIIM, who were generous in their advice and recommendations.

 

Eventually, I decided on partnering with a popular online outsourcing service and posted a proposal on their site.  The responses were overwhelming, from all corners of the world from the Ukraine, to China to New Delhi.

 

After two months I finally selected a developer from a lesser known region in New Delhi.  The process was tiring, from signing Non-Disclosure Agreements to testing, but it was well worth it.  The effort and expertise they offered was far and beyond anything I could expect from some programmers in the United States.  They were delighted to work my team as we were with them.  Our interactions with the good people of India have provided us with a fresh, genuine and positive perspective on globalism and mutual cultural prosperity.

 

After three years of development, over 14,000 man hours, and a thousand calls from antsy investors, we finally had our answer to comprehensive document, content and records management, and we call it Unified ECM.  In building Unified, our mission was and is to embrace the future of Enterprise Content Management, while respecting the innumerable contributions of archivists, librarians, records managers and others to the field of information management in all of its previous incarnations. 

 

Information is our music, and it lives, breathes and must adapt to change, as “creepy and kooky, mysterious and spooky” as it may seem.

Rod R. Blagojevich, Governor, on Electronic Records Management December 15, 2008

Posted by Unified ECM in Document Management Software, Filing Systems, Records Management, Uncategorized.
Tags: , , ,
1 comment so far
Hey, at least the Governor got it right on one thing.
EXECUTIVE ORDER NUMBER 8 (2006)

 

EXECUTIVE ORDER CREATING THE DIVISION OF PATIENT SAFETY WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH

 

WHEREAS , nearly 98,000 Americans die each year as a result of preventable medical errors and these patient safety errors cost Americans as much as $50 billion per year;

WHEREAS , thousands of Illinoisans die each year as a result of medical errors, costing Illinois citizens more than $1.5 billion per year in increased patient insurance premiums, hospital costs, co-pays, physician insurance rates, and prescription drug costs;

WHEREAS , current law, such as the Illinois Adverse Health Care Events Reporting Law and the Hospital Report Card Act, require the Department of Public Health to track medical errors and to create hospital report cards to apprise the public of existing problems;

WHEREAS , Illinois has created the Electronic Health Records Taskforce which is currently developing an electronic health records system in the State;

WHEREAS , the Illinois Health Network provides information technology upgrades for rural health care facilities to enable hospitals to quickly transmit information such as radiology images on-line;

WHEREAS , Illinois strives to remain at the forefront of health care and patient safety while reducing health care costs to Illinois taxpayers;

THERFORE, I, Rod R. Blagojevich, hereby order the following:

  • Creation of the Division of Patient Safety Within the Department of Public Health

There is hereby created a Division of Patient Safety (the “Division”) which shall be located within the Department of Public Health (the “Department”) that will consolidate the Department’s efforts to eliminate medical errors.

Powers and Duties

The Department shall work with existing advisory committees and additional persons, as necessary, to ensure that representatives of affected constituencies are informed of the work of the Division. The Division’s powers and duties shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

  •  
    •  
      • To encourage all medical providers to utilize e-prescribing programs by 2011. E-prescribing allows a physician to legibly write and electronically send prescriptions to reduce the risk of medication errors.
  •  
    •  
      • To evaluate the areas within Illinois in need of enhanced technology to support e-prescribing programs.
  •  
    •  
      • To determine the types of technology needed to implement the e-prescribing program.
  •  
    •  
      • To coordinate with the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation and the Department of Healthcare and Family Services to draft and issue recommended medication practices such as prescribing, dispensing, and maintenance to all health care providers.
  •  
    •  
      • To expand the Department’s nursing home database to include information such as staffing ratios, medication distribution, on-site services, and citations issued against each facility, enabling consumers to make well-informed decisions.
  •  
    •  
      •  
      • To implement and expand the State’s efforts at health care provider information transparency, such as the Hospital Report Card, the Consumer Guide to Health, and similar efforts to ensure that health care consumers and purchasers may make informed choices regarding the quality and cost effectiveness of medical care.
  •  
    •  
      • To implement the Illinois Adverse Health Care Events Reporting Law.

Savings Clause

Nothing in this Executive Order shall be construed to contravene any state or federal law.

Severability

If any provision of this Executive Order or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, this invalidity does not affect any other provision or application of this Executive Order which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application. To achieve this purpose, the provisions of this Executive Order are declared to be severable.

Effective Date

This Executive Order shall become effective upon filing with the Secretary of State.

  Rod R. Blagojevich, Governor

Issued by Governor: July 13, 2006
Filed with Secretary of State: July 13, 2006

Obama To Appoint Technology Czar – NPR NEWS December 9, 2008

Posted by Unified ECM in Document Management Software, Filing Systems, Records Management, Uncategorized.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

November 10, 2008 · President-elect Barack Obama is expected to create a position of chief technology officer. Technology commentator Mario Armstrong tells Renee Montagne that the position is important because some agencies already have chief information officers, and the effort needs to be centralized to make sure everybody is using the latest technology.

Obama Appoints Tech Czar / NPR Audio

President-elect Barack Obama quoted on Document Management December 9, 2008

Posted by Unified ECM in Document Management Software, Filing Systems, Records Management, Uncategorized.
Tags:
add a comment

This comes from a campaign stop in Nevada, last January…

Because I’m like, an ordinary person, I thought that they meant what’s your biggest weakness? Mr. Obama said.  So I said Well, I don’t handle paper that well. You know, my desk is a mess. I need somebody to help me file and stuff all the time.

Obama looking for a Chief Technology Officer from Google??? November 18, 2008

Posted by Unified ECM in Document Management Software, Filing Systems, Records Management, Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , ,
add a comment

obamablackberry

Just yesterday, Google CEO Eric Schmidt declared his support for Barack Obama, and already he wants to create a position for himself in Obama’s presumptive cabinet.

Alright, he’s been advising the Obama campaign behind the scenes for some time, but on Tuesday Schmidt is hitting the trail with his candidate, making his case on the ground.

In fact, all that work for Obama may have some personal (and institutional) benefits for Schmidt. According to the Wall Street Journal, Schmidt may be angling to be the country’s first Chief Technology Officer, a position that Obama promised to create if elected, oh, the day before visiting Google’s offices for the first time.

Schmidt may be a good fit, especially in light of Google’s interests in Washington, but this is not a Googlopoly. We’re taking nominations (after the jump). Who do you think should be Obama’s CTO?

Of course, you too can nominate yourself, but don’t be surprised if you only get one vote…

From CNET: If you’re borrowing from your vendor, you can’t afford it November 8, 2008

Posted by Unified ECM in Document Management Software, Filing Systems, Records Management, Uncategorized.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

TechDirt tries to put a pretty face on vendor-financed software/hardware deals, but let’s be clear: if you have to borrow from the vendor that is overpricing its software (or hardware) in the first place, you can’t afford to buy it. If you can’t afford to buy software (or hardware) with cash or bank financing, you can’t afford to buy software.

I’m not sure why this is complicated for some. The last organization you want to borrow from to buy software is your software vendor. This lets the vendor completely control your destiny, not to mention the fact that it creates serious conflicts of interest for the vendor (e.g., it can charge maximum price since it is financing the deal). This is the sort of muddled thinking that put the global economy in the toilet in the first place.

Valleywag is right to call out that such arrangements usually end badly for technology shareholders. Defaults on loans are a fact of life, whether for bank loans or vendor loans. The difference is that vendors have to not only back out of bad loans, but also the revenue.

I have a better idea: spend less on IT. Buy open source.

Matt Asay is general manager of the Americas and vice president of business development at Alfresco, and has nearly a decade of operational experience with commercial open source and regularly speaks and publishes on open-source business strategy. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

So, John McCain KNOWS it’s a good idea to put health records online… October 25, 2008

Posted by Unified ECM in Document Management Software, Filing Systems, Records Management, Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , ,
1 comment so far

We need to put health care records online. The V.A. does that. That will — that will reduce costs.  – John McCain.

For a maverick who openly admits not knowing how to use a computer, it came as a bit of a surprise to me in the last debate to hear that John McCain KNOWS it’s a good idea to put health care records online.   Aside from the obvious invasion of privacy violations that such a policy would undoubtedly create, the idea that it would reduce costs is highly doubtful.  It basically amounts to a handout of government contracts to document management companies, possibly in the billions, with absolutely NO proven cost/benefit analysis from his campaign.

In addition, has it occured to Mr. McCain that health records are kept by doctors, insurance companies, hospitals and employers?  Is John McCain proposing that they all just head down to Staples, buy their own scanners and hire their own extra staff to scan, index, catalog and maintain hundreds of millions of pages of pages of records.  What software does he propose everyone use and does he know how much those systems cost?  And who exactly will coordinate this operation, or mission… the Department of Earmarks?

You’d think people in my business would be absolutely thrilled about this baseless assumption.  And you’re probably right.  But I think this cuts to the very heart of this campaign because I don’t need a handout in the form of a government contract.  I need a government that realizes it already has a contract to the American people to “think” before they speak about businesses that they have no understanding of whatsoever.

I’ll make this perfectly clear.  I believe wholeheartedly in scanning and imaging as a practical and necessary tool for the smooth and efficient handling of an office’s day to day workflow.  However, the notion that putting documents online reduces paper-output is erroneous.

Take the law profession for example.  Before computers, attorneys drafted only a few copies of pleadings, contracts and correspondence.  They did this because of the time involved in editing errors and mistakes.  Legal professionals today have the benefit of editing a document as much as they want because of computers.  As a result, they print out many more documents and increase the demand for paper, which has devastating effects on the environment as well.

Having worked for government and in records management for the last ten years, including as the Records Manager for Trucker Huss, a venerated Employee Benefits firm with some of the most respected HIPAA attorneys in the world, I feel I am entitled as say “Raf The Records Manager” to call him out on this.

The HIPAA law, while achieving some of its goals to fight against identity theft and abuse, was nevertheless a multi-million dollar donation to the tech companies that were enlisted to execute the specifics of the law.  The cost to law firms and corporations to restructure their records polices and procedures was unnecessary and unwarranted.

The blacking out of names and social security numbers on patient records and other documents may have sounded like a good idea, but tell that to the thousands of medical office managers around the country.  That HIPAA requirement as well as a number of others impeded office workflow because it was designed by politicians who had absolutely no input from actual end users or the individuals their law would actually impact.

If John McCain really wants to save some money on records management, maybe he should ask a records manager, a librarian, a file clerk, or ANYBODY who actually works with records for advice.  Or maybe he should ask “Joe The 72 year old Doctor” or “Tito the 55 year old Nurse” how they feel about putting down their pens and paper and buying a machine they don’t know how to use instead.

Records are kept best, and records management overhead costs are kept lowest when organizations and government departments avoid gimmicks like “the paperless office” and take a more thoughtful approach to managing their information, and the information of others.

A Sharp Architect’s Insight Into EDMS September 3, 2008

Posted by Unified ECM in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , ,
add a comment

Electronic Document Management for the Small Office

Synopsis
Electronic document management has great potential to benefit a small firm, because every efficiency counts when staffing is limited. This article explores ways in which simple software tools can reduce the amount of time and paper spent on document production and processing, and can improve communications with clients and contractors as well.
*****

At my architecture firm, which specializes in smaller projects, I am the lead designer, secretary, bookkeeper, draftsman, IT manager, and janitor. Although I love doing these jobs, I’ve found that efficiency at each of them is critical to working them all successfully. Almost all the duties in an architectural office involve documents of some sort, either drawings or memos produced by office staff; or letters, submittals, and RFIs received from contractors and owners. In the course of processing all this paper–generating, mailing, filing, and throwing it out–I began to understand the potential savings, both in time and material costs, of converting most of these documents to an electronic form.

In the discussion below, I will first cover some of the ways in which electronic documents can be used in a small office without investing in major new technologies or an all-encompassing, rigid system. These procedures can be implemented incrementally, as needed and when they are really helpful. In the final part of the article I will touch briefly on the technical means of implementation.

The Less-Paper Office
We’ve all heard, at various times in the past decade or so, about the “paperless office.” I don’t work in one, and I hope I never will. Paper is a great thing, and it is well suited to many tasks. But where I’ve found that it improves my efficiency at work, I have made an effort to reduce the amount of paper that comes in and goes out of the office. The methods are simple:

I have slowly migrated most correspondence to e-mail. An e-mail message works best for basic communications–a question or comment, for instance. Organizing and saving all these messages is the tricky part. Devising a functional and searchable system is important.
For documents that require special formatting, such as meeting notes, contract forms, or change orders, the Portable Document Format (PDF) is a great solution. Clients, consultants, and contractors are all familiar with the Adobe Acrobat Reader, and they are able to read and print documents in this format. And when they do print it out, it’s on their paper, not mine. I’ll deal with methods of creating PDF files later in this article.

I generate invoices from my accounting software as PDFs and e-mail them to all my clients. This saves on paper, and e-mail receipts can be requested when necessary to verify that a client has received or read the invoice.

Recently I have also started producing all my drawings (large and small format) as PDF files. This allows me to e-mail check plots to clients or to deliver final documents to them in a format that they can easily print themselves at Kinko’s or any blueprint shop, even if they don’t have my pen settings or any other technical information.

I also generate PDF files from my three-dimensional rendering software and e-mail these to clients for quick sign-offs on design concepts. Raster (bitmap) images are compressed in PDF files, and a high-quality rendering can be made quite compact for e-mailing and on-screen viewing.

All faxes sent to my office are captured on my computer, and then I convert them to PDF if needed. This makes it easy to forward a fax to someone else as an e-mail attachment. It also saves paper on junk faxes, which can just be deleted from the computer without being printed.

I use the fax modem on my computer to send documents to people who do not have e-mail. Usually I print directly from Acrobat to the fax, thus bypassing paper again.

The time savings to e-mail a PDF file to four people rather than copy, address, stamp, and mail four sets of a paper documents is substantial. The cost savings in postage and stationery is easily a dollar or two per mailing. That adds up, and who can really remember (or bring themselves) to bill the client for it?

The Low-Budget Extranet
In the last few years I have been following with interest the developments in project extranets such as Buzzsaw, as they have promised time and money savings for architects. But these sites have always seemed oriented to larger projects with budgets to support the hosting company’s overhead. For small projects it is hard to justify the cost and complexity of a full-blown extranet solution. However, some of the features of project extranets, especially during the bidding process, would be very helpful for small projects.

Recently I implemented a simplified version of a project extranet for an addition to a Montessori preschool and kindergarten. This job was competitively bid to invited general contractors. My engineering consultants and I all produced our documents (drawings and specs) as PDF files. We posted the bidding documents to a special password-protected page on my firm’s Web site so that bidders or subs and suppliers could view the documents without having to go to a plan room. The files are located at www.jt-architecture.com/methods/bidding/childrenshouse/index.htm (to log on to the site, leave the username blank and enter password children).

This system was especially helpful when issuing addenda, as I could post an addendum on the site and send an e-mail to all bidders notifying them of the new posting. They and their subs were able to see the addendum immediately, and I did not have to fax or mail multi-page documents to each of them.

An unexpected advantage of generating our drawings in PDF form appeared when we created our checksets as PDFs in order to test the system. Adobe Acrobat has markup tools for PDF files, including redlines and comments. I was able to review and comment on all my consultants’ drawings without ever paying for check plots, and the drawings could be easily and quickly exchanged via e-mail. Also I could type my verbose notes instead of writing them–always a pleasure! To view a sample markup sheet, go to: http://www.jt-architecture.com/methods/bidding/childrenshouse/markup.pdf (password is same as noted above). To read the note text, double-click on the “post-its” that you see on screen.

The Web page was used the most during bidding, although I have kept it active because every so often I need to refer a supplier to this page. In this project, though, we don’t really need a central site and e-mail works just fine. If there were project participants who wanted to check in on our progress at certain times but did not need to be copied on every bit of correspondence, we could post relevant documents on the site for review. In addition to its low cost, the value of this simple extranet is its simplicity.

Electronic construction administration documents
One requirement of the project manual for the Montessori preschool was that the owner and contractor would purchase Adobe Acrobat and use it to generate and approve project-related correspondence (see section 01310 of the online project manual for specifics). Although the project has been under construction for only a couple of months, this has been very successful. We have been using the system in several ways:

I typically send out all supplemental drawings or memos as PDFs attached to e-mails, so the contractor gets a clear copy immediately. The contractor prepares pay requests from AIA electronic documents and prints them as PDFs, then applies digital signatures using Acrobat. These are then e-mailed to me, and I approve them with a digital signature before forwarding them to the owner and back to the contractor. In this way, the approval time for pay requests goes from days to hours. We can all electronically verify each other’s approval (Acrobat has the infrastructure in place for secure digital signatures) and these signatures are legally binding.

Change orders are also generated as PDFs. The owner, architect, and contractor sign the change order with a digital signature as it is circulated via e-mail. Again, approval time can be cut to a matter of hours with no need for a meeting.

Submittals could be processed electronically, but we have not done this yet. Submittal processing requires that the subcontractor and supplier be on board with this system, and so far that has proven to be more work than the time savings would justify. It would be easy to do, though, with the markup and stamping features provided by Acrobat.

In comparison to an extranet site like Buzzsaw, this type of system is more distributed and more flexible. It depends on e-mail and on people keeping copies of the files on their own computers rather than on everyone looking to a central server to store and display the documents. The obvious advantages and drawbacks apply.

Future Directions
The measures described above, as implemented at my office in the past year, have significantly improved my productivity. When I look at the remaining paper-based procedures in the office, though, I can identify four areas that could benefit from conversion to an electronic format.

Digital signatures on construction documents
As illustrated in the Montessori preschool project, my office generates construction documents electronically. However, the printed drawings submitted to codes are still signed by hand. If we could instead apply digital signature to the PDF files, it would allow them to be securely emailed or printed anywhere without a “wet stamp” or signature. For more information on this subject, refer to www.jt-architecture.com/methods/ds_architecture.pdf. Although we use digital signatures for change orders and pay requests, to apply this technology to construction documents we must address some specific requirements of state licensing boards. Digitally stamping and signing of architectural documents is legal in Tennessee (although each state has its own requirements). As far as I know, however, no one in our state is currently using digital signatures in a manner consistent with the state board rules. This is an issue that I hope to pursue further in the next year.

Electronic measurements
Once the PDF documents have been sent to the contractor or bidder, extracting useful information from these documents in electronic form is sometimes a challenge. Bidders usually have to print the documents out to do take-offs or other estimating tasks. In response to this problem I have developed a plug-in tool for Adobe Acrobat and Reader that will allow contractors and owners to make accurate distance and area measurements from PDF drawings. This plug-in is available online at www.linetype.com. My hope is that this plug-in will allow more extensive use of CDs in their electronic form.

Submittals
As mentioned earlier, submittals could be processed electronically, and doing so would realize considerable savings. I have always been amazed that I have to write all my notes out three times when reviewing a submittal; by commenting on a PDF file, it could be done once and then returned to the contractor immediately.

Payments
Although I already pay my phone bill and Internet charges electronically, I still write out checks and print envelopes for payments to consultants, the reprographer, and the courier service. If we could all get registered on paypal.com or some similar service, bills could be paid and received much more quickly. There is no technical obstacle here, it’s just a matter of convincing people to change.

Technical Summary and Resources
Firms that do small-project work usually do not have the support staff or the money for a complicated electronic document management system. The software and services listed here are all low cost, off-the-shelf solutions.

Adobe Acrobat (not the free Acrobat Reader) is the best way to produce and edit PDF files, either from typical office applications or from CAD software. It sells for $249 from the Adobe Web site and various software vendors. If you plan on doing anything significant with PDF files, it is well worth the money. In an office where several people might be creating PDF files and not everyone needs all the features of Acrobat, there are lower-cost, simpler solutions. See www.linetype.com/advice/pdfcreation for a summary.

For more information on producing PDF documents from CAD software, visit www.linetype.com/advice/cad. Also see the link above on PDF creation tools.

When you send a PDF file to someone as an e-mail attachment, it is considerate to include a link to the free Acrobat Reader download, just in case they don’t have it installed or if they have an old version. The download site is www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html
A fax machine that can connect to your computer is a real asset. Incoming faxes can then be captured on the computer rather than printed, and outgoing faxes can be sent directly from your computer just by printing to the fax “printer” driver. Multi-page paper documents can also be scanned using the fax machine page feeder. This works fine for 400 dpi, black and white scans that can then be converted to PDFs. The fax machine can also serve as a printer if you need it.
Regular backups of your disk drive are always a good idea, but when the majority of your documents are electronic it is even more important. Invest in a backup system with enough capacity to save your entire drive every day, and consider using multiple tapes (one for each day of the week) for redundancy. The very first time you need it, you will consider it well worth the cost.

PAPER VERSUS PLASTIC August 12, 2008

Posted by Unified ECM in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

From the same people who brought you “the paperless office” as reported in DispatchPolitics.com

 

Missing votes spark lawsuit
Brunner: Touch-screen machines defective, company should pay
—————————————-
The touch-screen voting setup used in half of Ohio’s 88 counties doesn’t work properly, and the former Diebold Election Systems should pay as a result, Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner said in a court filing yesterday. 

The move comes fewer than 90 days before Ohio voters go to the polls in an election that could decide the presidential race, but Brunner says safeguards will be in place by then in the affected counties to mitigate any risks.

“We will make the equipment work, but this is not something that Ohio should be satisfied with for the long term,” Brunner said. “Our goal is to have Ohio taxpayers compensated for this equipment that doesn’t function properly.”

Brunner is seeking punitive damages from Diebold, now Premier Election Solutions, after she said an investigation showed that votes in at least 11 counties were “dropped” in recent elections when memory cards were uploaded to computer servers.

Elections workers discovered the missing votes, but not until many hours later in most cases, Brunner said. The malfunction first was discovered in Butler County in April, she said.

Forty-four counties, including Licking and Fairfield in central Ohio, use Premier touch-screens. Franklin County uses touch-screens from a different manufacturer.

Premier filed a lawsuit against the state and Cuyahoga County in May seeking a ruling that it had satisfied the obligations of its state contract to provide touch-screen voting machines in the county, which replaced the equipment this year.

County officials responded by accusing the company of breach of contract, fraud and negligence, and Brunner filed a counterclaim against the company yesterday in Franklin County Common Pleas Court.

Brunner wants the court to find that Premier made false representations about its equipment and failed to live up to contractual obligations and warranties. Ohio spent millions of dollars in mostly federal funds to upgrade voting systems after problems with punch-card ballots in Florida in the 2000 presidential election.

Premier spokesman Chris Riggall said he hadn’t seen the court filing and couldn’t comment on it specifically.

But he said a conflict was identified involving the company’s software and virus-protection software. A product advisory was issued in May, but Brunner said her office still is reviewing that explanation.

Riggall defended the systems, which he said are used nationwide and have features in Ohio, including a paper audit trail, to ensure votes are counted.

“We have, in fact, provided a quality voting system,” he said. Last year, North Canton-based Diebold Inc. sought to make its Allen, Texas-based elections division more independent and changed its name.

Brunner, a first-term Democrat, commissioned a study last fall that concluded all touch-screen voting systems used in Ohio are substandard and should be replaced with a paper-ballot system.

But the Republican-controlled legislature and many elections officials objected, saying no election system is perfect and that security procedures should be beefed up instead. That is happening this fall.

Steve Harsman, director of the Montgomery County Board of Elections, said there were three instances since 2005 when memory cards in his county did not upload votes. The problem was caught but chalked up to human error at the time, he said.

Harsman, a former president of the Ohio Association of Election Officials, said he’s confident that the problem has been identified and that procedures will be in place this fall to avoid any problems.

White House Filing in CREW Lawsuit Admits to Destroying Back-up Copies of Emails July 18, 2008

Posted by Unified ECM in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , ,
add a comment

Missing Emails Cover Start of Iraq War, Leaking of Valerie Plame

WASHINGTON–(Business Wire)
Yesterday’s midnight filing by the White House in CREW v. Executive Office of the President, a lawsuit challenging the failure of the White House to preserve and restore millions of missing emails, raises some very troubling questions that the White House clearly does not want to answer.

The White House has now admitted that it does not have an
effective system for storing and preserving emails. This is no mere
technicality; it is this failure that led to the likely destruction of
over 10 million email. What the White House has not explained is why
it abandoned the electronic record-keeping system used by the prior
administration — a system that properly preserved White House email
– but did not replace it with another effective and appropriate
system.

The White House has also admitted that the only safeguard it has
to its patently inadequate method for preserving email (dumping them
in files that are put on EOP servers) is back-up tape media. These
back-up copies, however, are only a “snapshot” of what was on the
server at the time of the back-up. In other words they are not
comprehensive, as the White House concedes.

Even more troubling, the White House has now admitted that until
October 2003, the White House recycled its back-up tapes, which
contained the only copies of emails deleted prior to that date. What
the White House has not explained is why it changed its policy of
preserving all back-up tapes — instituted in March of 2000 when the
Clinton administration discovered that its system did not fully
preserve all email from the Office of the Vice President — at the
same time it decided to dismantle the existing electronic
record-keeping system, with no replacement at hand.

The deletion of millions of email beginning in March 2003 coupled
with the White House’s destruction of back-up copies of those deleted
email mean that there are no back-up copies of emails deleted during
the period March 2003 through October 2003. The significance of this
time-period cannot be overstated: the U.S. went to war with Iraq, top
White House officials leaked the covert identity of Valerie Plame
Wilson and the Justice Department opened a criminal investigation into
their actions.

The White House now claims there is a lack of documentation
supporting both the fact that email are missing and the volume of
missing email. Yet in January 2006, Special Counsel Patrick
Fitzgerald, in a letter to Scooter Libby’s lawyers, stated
unequivocally: “We have learned that not all email of the Office of
Vice President and the Executive Office of President for certain time
periods in 2003 was preserved through the normal archiving process on
the White House computer system.” Moreover, when the problem was
uncovered the White House Office of Administration created abundant
documentation that included multiple estimates of the volume of
missing email, not a single chart that the White House now suggests is
the only documentation. Could it be that having now destroyed the
evidence documenting the missing email problem, the White House feels
free to retreat from its acknowledgment to Mr. Fitzgerald that White
House emails are missing?

Also missing from the White House’s latest explanation of the
missing email is why, more than two years after it discovered the
problem, the White House still cannot say what happened, why it
happened and how many email were affected. And the White House has yet
to offer an explanation for why it never acted to recover any of the
missing emails, even when presented with a recovery plan by its own
Office of Administration.

It is perfectly clear why the White House has used every strategic
maneuver it can think of to avoid answering any questions about the
missing email: its answers are likely to raise more questions than
they answer. That, years after the problem was discovered, the White
House is still questioning whether or not there is even a problem is
deeply disturbing.

Anne Weismann, chief counsel to CREW, said today, “With this new
filing, the White House has admitted that although it has long known
about the missing emails, it did nothing to recover them, or discover
how and why they went missing in the first place. The missing emails
are important historical records that belong not to the Bush
administration, but to the American people. As a result, the public
deserves a full accounting and hopefully, now that the matter is
before a federal court, we will get one.”

The White House filing can be found on CREW’s website.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) is a
non-profit legal watchdog group dedicated to holding public officials
accountable for their actions. For more information, please visit
www.citizensforethics.org or contact Naomi Seligman Steiner at
202.408.5565/nseligman@citizensforethics.org.

CREW
Naomi Seligman Steiner, 202-408-5565

Copyright Business Wire 2008

FILING at Lestercorp. July 17, 2008

Posted by Unified ECM in Uncategorized.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

My Thoughts On The Paperless Office July 16, 2008

Posted by Unified ECM in Uncategorized.
Tags:
add a comment

False, Ridiculous & Distorted! July 16, 2008

Posted by Unified ECM in Uncategorized.
add a comment

Vinegar Syndrome July 16, 2008

Posted by Unified ECM in Uncategorized.
Tags:
add a comment
VINEGAR SYNDROME

Two opinions from a rec.arts.movies.tech thread:

OPINION 1

There are many “wive’stales” out there, but none of them has had any scientific backing as ofyet.What causes vinegar syndrome? Well, there are many. The most commoncause is improper storage in overly humid environments. Other causes arepoor processing and some types of scratch rejuvenation.So what are molecular sieves? They are small packets which are placed inthe cans of deteriorating film. They absorb most of the acetic acidvapors which are being released from the film base. These vapors (whichsmell like vinegar) are what attack the emulsion as well as the plasticacetate base support. If the sieves are used in tandem with proper coldstorage (below 50 degrees F and 40% relative humidity) then this will slowthe deterioration down to a crawl.[snip]Cleaning your film with commercial film cleaners should be limited tothose which do not have any oils in them, if you’re cleaning films withvinegar syndrome. Trichloroethane based cleaners, or just straighttrichloroethane, is very good. Ecco brand and J&R Film cleaner are good.Vitafilm and Surfaset have silicons &oils in them. Oils tend to trap in the acetic acid vapors, which willhasten the deterioration. Make sure you use a clean velvet or Webril Wipewhen doing a cleaning. Unless the print is dirty, however, it’s best toleave well enough alone. Passing a film through a cloth can potentiallycause scratches. Be very careful to stop periodically and shake out therag in case dirt builds up in it.[snip]

OPINION 2

I have heard conflicting advice on the best method for long term storage of>film negative. Room temperature, cool, or frozen?> What humidity is best?Jim,The National Film Board of Canada has begun tests on freezing monopackcolor negs, but beyond that I couldn’t tell you the long-term effectsof freezing your negative. Some members of the AMIA-L (Assoc. ofMoving Image Archivists) listserv expressed concern that if theproceedure was not carried-out with great control, then the base,emulsion or both could be fractured by the excessive moisture contentof the emulsion, due to expansion of the freezing water. There wereother issues as well, but I don’t remember them off-hand.At the present time, I believe the consensus is that the optimalstorage temperature is near, but not below, freezing with a relativehumidity of 30 – 40%.>Will dessicants in the film cans dry out the film too much?In a word, yes. Unless you are storing the film in a very humidplace, I would not put sillica gel in the cans. If you are storingthe film in a humid environment and cannot control the atmosphere inany other way than using sillica gel; store the film in an oversizedcan, on cores and laying flat (you should always store film on coresand laying on-edge – never store on reels and in the uprightposition). I would suggest you attach the gel canister to the can lidwith pop rivets (or other non-chemical based method to avoid harmfuladhesive fumes) over the center of the core. If you lay the packet inon top of the roll, you may cause the film to dry-out in the areadirecly beneath the gel and cause dimensional problems in the future.Check the canister and gel every two-weeks and turn the roll over toequalize the absorption across the web of the film. I really don’tknow how you would monitor the relative humidity of the can, but astable atmosphere is critical. Cycles of humidity and extreme drynesscan cause severe stress on the emulsion; causing fractures, acrossthe web shrinkage and maybe even vinegar syndrome. Who knows?Also, don’t store film in tight-fitting cans; let it breathe. Safetyhas a tendency to go vinegar if sealed-up in a can (not so much if thetemp is low), so keep the film in loose-fitting, oversized cans.If you can afford it, throw in a few molecular sieves per can; can’thurt (at least as far as we know!).> I definitely appreciate Jim Harwood’s helpful post. If the ideal>condition is below 50 degrees at 40% relative humididy, would it be a>good idea>to devote a refrigerator to storing my original negative for my films?I think so. The greater volume of air would be easier to stabilize andmaintain a good relative humidity level. A fairly inexpensive weatherstation (indoor/outdoor type) could be mounted on the door to keep acheck on the interior without opening the door. I would NOT suggestyou use a “frost-free” type of refrigerator, as they remove humidityto keep-out frost and could freeze-dry your film. If the fridge tendsto keep a dry atmosphere; put a few damp rags in a film can, punch afew holes in the top and place it in the bottom of the refrigerator.If too damp, use sillica gel cansiters to lower the RH. You will haveto experiment to find a method of regulation, but it should not be toohard. Freezing it worse than refrigerating it? Will the wrong temperature or humidity wreak havoc on glue splices?At the present time, I would say cold storage, but don’t freeze just yet. Until more testing is conducted, try a method that has had somesuccess in the past.As for the splices; they would be my least worry. A cement splicecan be remade without too much fuss; and without loosing a frame. Iwould worry about fungus, mold, air pollution, solvents and othernasties attacking the emulsion; along with the natural tendency ofdyes to fade over time.The biggest problems in preservation of color negative are:1. Dye fading – solution: copy when dyes start to fade. That’sabout all you can do. Forget digitizing; the storage medium won’tlast as long as the original negative and “Who the heck can afford itanyway ?”.2. Shrinkage of base – solution: maintiain proper humidity and temp.Make new dupe preservation neg when approaching 0.5% linear shrinkageof the film. Shrinkage should be measured over the length of one-footof film and expressed as a percentage of the total original distanceon a fresh piece of properly-pitched stock (get the right pitch, itmatters!). We use shrinkage-gauges built by Mauer in the 50’s; Idon’t know what to suggest for a homebrew measuring device. You starthaving printing problems (movement and breathing in the printer gate)at about 0.6 % on “standard” printers. When you exceede that amount,you have to have it printed on a modified printer; one with thesprocket teeth cut-down and movement is almost assured when you printthat way.3. Emulsion damage – don’t handle the film excessively, but doexercise the roll at least once a year by rewinding. Some claim youshould store the film emulsion-in (contrary to lab practice!), but weat the LOC store all our originals emulsion-out. Why? I guess it’sjust easier to handle when printing when would emulsion-out.4. Environmental damage – Solvents, ozone, gases, etc. attack thebase, emulsion or both. Keep storage areas clean and free fromvolatile chemicals and or liquids.Whew! Hope that helps somewhat.  Frank Wylie  fwylie@infinet.com

Rising Costs of Storing New Media, From NY Times, DEC ‘07 July 14, 2008

Posted by Unified ECM in Uncategorized.
Tags: ,
add a comment

TIME was, a movie studio could pack up a picture and all of its assorted bloopers, alternate takes and other odds and ends as soon as the production staff was done with them, and ship them off to the salt mine. Literally.

Having figured out that really big money comes from reselling old films — on broadcast television, then cable, videocassettes, DVDs, and so on — companies like Warner Brothers and Paramount Pictures for decades have been tucking their 35-millimeter film masters and associated source material into archives, some of which are housed in a Kansas salt mine, or in limestone mines in Kansas and Pennsylvania.

A picture could sit for many, many years, cool and comfortable, until some enterprising executive decided that the time was ripe for, say, a Wallace Beery special collection timed to a 25th-anniversary 3-D rerelease of “Barton Fink,” with a hitherto unseen, behind-the-scenes peek at the Coen brothers trying to explain a Hollywood in-joke to John Turturro.
It was a file-and-forget system that didn’t cost much, and made up for the self-destructive sins of an industry that discarded its earliest works or allowed films on old flammable stock to degrade. (Indeed, only half of the feature films shot before 1950 survive.)

But then came digital. And suddenly the film industry is wrestling again with the possibility that its most precious assets, the pictures, aren’t as durable as they used to be.

The problem became public, but just barely, last month, when the science and technology council of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences released the results of a yearlong study of digital archiving in the movie business. Titled “The Digital Dilemma,” the council’s report surfaced just as Hollywood’s writers began their walkout. Busy walking, or dodging, the picket lines, industry types largely missed the report’s startling bottom line: To store a digital master record of a movie costs about $12,514 a year, versus the $1,059 it costs to keep a conventional film master.

Much worse, to keep the enormous swarm of data produced when a picture is “born digital” — that is, produced using all-electronic processes, rather than relying wholly or partially on film — pushes the cost of preservation to $208,569 a year, vastly higher than the $486 it costs to toss the equivalent camera negatives, audio recordings, on-set photographs and annotated scripts of an all-film production into the cold-storage vault.

All of this may seem counterintuitive. After all, digital magic is supposed to make information of all kinds more available, not less. But ubiquity, it turns out, is not the same as permanence.
In a telephone interview earlier this month, Milton Shefter, a longtime film preservationist who helped prepare the academy’s report, said the problems associated with digital movie storage, if not addressed, could point the industry “back to the early days, when they showed a picture for a week or two, and it was thrown away.”

Mr. Shefter and his associates do not contend that films are actually on the verge of becoming quite that ephemeral. But they do see difficulties and trends that could point many movies or the source material associated with them toward “digital extinction” over a relatively short span of years, unless something changes.

At present, a copy of virtually all studio movies — even those like “Click” or “Miami Vice” that are shot using digital processes — is being stored in film format, protecting the finished product for 100 years or more. For film aficionados, the current practice is already less than perfect. Regardless of how they are shot, most pictures are edited digitally, and then a digital master is transferred to film, which can result in an image of lower quality than a pure film process — and this is what becomes stored for the ages.

But over the next couple of decades, archivists reason, the conversion of theaters to digital projection will sharply reduce the overall demand for film, eventually making it a sunset market for the main manufacturers, Kodak, Fujifilm and Agfa. At that point, pure digital storage will become the norm, bringing with it a whole set of problems that never troubled film.
To begin with, the hardware and storage media — magnetic tapes, disks, whatever — on which a film is encoded are much less enduring than good old film. If not operated occasionally, a hard drive will freeze up in as little as two years. Similarly, DVDs tend to degrade: according to the report, only half of a collection of disks can be expected to last for 15 years, not a reassuring prospect to those who think about centuries. Digital audiotape, it was discovered, tends to hit a “brick wall” when it degrades. While conventional tape becomes scratchy, the digital variety becomes unreadable.

DIFFICULTIES of that sort are compounded by constant change in technology. As one generation of digital magic replaces the next, archived materials must be repeatedly “migrated” to the new format, or risk becoming unreadable. Thus, NASA scientists found in 1999 that they were unable to read digital data saved from a Viking space probe in 1975; the format had long been obsolete.

All of that makes digital archiving a dynamic rather than static process, and one that costs far more than studios have been accustomed to paying in the past — no small matter, given that movie companies rely on their libraries for about one-third of their $36 billion in annual revenue, according to a recent assessment by the research service Global Media Intelligence.
“It’s been in the air since we started talking about doing things digitally,” Chris Cookson, president of Warner’s technical operations and chief technology officer, said of the archiving quandary.

One of the most perplexing realities of a digital production like “Superman Returns” is that it sometimes generates more storable material than conventional film, creating new questions about what to save. Such pile-ups can occur, for instance, when a director or cinematographer who no longer has to husband film stock simply allows cameras to remain running for long stretches while working out scenes.

Much of the resulting data may be no more worth saving that the misspellings and awkward phrases deleted from a newspaper reporter’s word-processing screen. Then again, a telling exchange between star and filmmaker might yield gold as a “special feature” on some future home-viewing format — so who wants to be responsible for tossing it into the digital dustbin?
For now, studios are saving as much of this digital ephemera as possible, storing it on tapes or drives in vaults not unlike those that house traditional film. But how much of that material will be migrated when technology shifts in 7 or 10 years is anyone’s guess. (And archiving practices in the independent film world run the gamut, from studied preservation to complete inattention, noted Andrew Maltz, director of the academy’s science and technology council.)

According to Mr. Shefter, a universal standard for storage technology would go far toward reducing a problem that would otherwise grow every time the geniuses who create digital hardware come up with something a little better than their last bit of wizardry.
As the report put it, “If we allow technological obsolescence to repeat itself, we are tied either to continuously increasing costs — or worse — the failure to save important assets.”
In other words, we could be watching Wallace Beery long after more contemporary images are gone.